Re: Proposing gnome-backgrounds for Inclusion in 2.6



On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 23:34, Erick Woods wrote:
> On 28 Oct 2003, Christian Rose wrote:
> 
> > > > > Note: Gnome-backgrounds may be renamed to gnome-wallpapers at some
> point,
> > > > > probably need to talk to the documentation team.
> > > >
> > > > (FWIW, that makes sense to me, if we go with 'wallpaper' in the UI.)
> > >
> > > Just a thought - before you had a computer, did you ever change your
> > > "wallpaper" on your "desktop"?  That is confusing to users, in my
> > > experience.  Maybe background is fine after all?
> >
> > If you want to propose changes to the current GNOME terminology, please
> > do that on the gnome-doc-list.
> >
> 
> That wasn't the goal, really.  The thought occurred to me in the context of
> the conversation and I think it applies more to the people implementing the
> interface - are they checking some master location for GNOME terminology?  I
> wasn't aware there was one and you didn't reference it.  gnome-doc-list is
> copied on this.

http://developer.gnome.org/documents/style-guide/gnome-glossary-desktop.html

And friends.

-- 
Andrew Sobala <as583 cam ac uk>

Given by our hand in the meadow that is called Runnymede, between
Windsor and Staines, on the fifteenth day of June in the seventeenth
year of our reign.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]