Re: new smb method



Hello Bastien,

I've tried this packages and things do not really improve that much.
I shouldn't have to have a local smb server configured on my machine
right? I ask this because the text below seems to indicate such a thing
which would be weird... but I don't know much about windows shares
anyway.

Rui

On Mon, 2003-05-26 at 14:24, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-05-26 at 15:09, Mike Hearn wrote:
> > Seems to work OK here, with a few caveats:
> > 
> > smb:/// (ie network servers) says "Could not display all of smb://" or
> > something like that. Previously it said something about being unable to
> > contact the SMB Master Browser.
> 
> That means that your SMB configuration is a bit horked somewhere. I have
> the same problems on my home network, work's network works fine though.
> I wouldn't be able to say what's causing it.
> 
> Browsing to something like smb://servername/ should work though.
> 
> > When browsing into shares etc I am repeatedly asked for my
> > username/password over and over. This has always been a problem with me
> > and Samba though, not sure if it's this code to blame.
> 
> The new method doesn't do any caching. This should be fixed at some
> point with the gnome-vfs daemon. Will have to wait a bit more still.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> PS: I updated the packages on
> http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/gnome-vfs-extras-smbclient/
> There were a couple of last minute bugs fixed
-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]