Re: 2.4 Proposed Modules - 2 weeks left
- From: Andrew Sobala <aes gnome org>
- To: Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, mpeseng tin it, MArk Finlay <sisob eircom net>, Murray Cumming Comneon com, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: 2.4 Proposed Modules - 2 weeks left
- Date: 30 Apr 2003 21:41:22 +0100
On Wed, 2003-04-30 at 19:09, Bill Haneman wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-04-30 at 18:41, Andrew Sobala wrote:
> ...
> > Indeed :-)
> >
> > If we have a browser team committed to getting accessibility working as
> > soon as the Sun's mozilla accessibility team get the atk tree exported,
> > I think we can ship that browser. It's not a regression, it just doesn't
> > work yet and there's nothing that GNOME can do to speed up the process
> > when we're blocking on Sun's work.
>
> Your email is reasonable, except that I object to the phrase "blocking
> on Sun's work". Since this issue affects GNOME but not Sun... so Sun
> has no particular ownership of this issue, the only logical reason for
> Sun to do it is expertise/familiarity with the relevant codebase.
> Other folks are welcome to help do this work :-)
I know that. Of course I mean "Blocking on certain aspects of mozilla
accessibility work, currently being worked on by Sun..."
As you say, mozilla hackers are more likely to be able to help in this
work than GNOME hackers with no knowledge of the codebase.
--
Andrew Sobala <aes gnome org>
"A freudian slip is when you say one thing but you mean your mother." -- unknown
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]