Re: Killing views [Was: Dealing with files in Gnome]
- From: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- To: Sean Middleditch <elanthis awesomeplay com>
- Cc: GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, twaugh redhat com
- Subject: Re: Killing views [Was: Dealing with files in Gnome]
- Date: 03 Apr 2003 19:11:47 +0100
On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 19:06, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 12:07, Ali Akcaagac wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 April 2003 17:13, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> >
> > Yes, this is definately true. This also doesn't change the fact that on Linux
> > systems I pretty much think that CUPS is better and easier to administrate
> > than LprNG + Apsfilter and imo a good direction as printing solution. If
> > there are other solutions for commercial other *nix'es then fine.
>
> CUPS then has to actually be in use on the majority of Free OS's then
> for it to be The GNOME Printing System. RedHat used LPRng by default
> until RH9, Slackware(iirc) just switched to lprng from an older system,
> etc.
Nope, RH has been using CUPS as the default since 7.3.
> Still doesn't change the fact that GNOME just shouldn't care what
> underlying print spooler is used - if necessary, just use
> components/plugins for specialized features in a generic, neutral
> interface. Then I can mix-and-match spool systems based on actual
> needs, not an artificial spooler popularity contest. ^,^
RH already has a "Print" icon on the desktop. Copied Tim on it, he's
responsible for it iirc :)
Cheers
--
Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]