Re: gnome-recent (plans)
- From: Anders Carlsson <andersca gnu org>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: James Willcox <jwillcox cs indiana edu>, Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gnome-recent (plans)
- Date: 04 Jul 2002 10:27:32 +0200
On Thu, 2002-07-04 at 05:13, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> I still wonder if we shouldn't install libegg, and protect it with
> LIBEGG_I_KNOW_THESE_ARE_PROTOTYPES or something.
>
I'm not sure that's a good idea:
* Many applications are just using one or two "features" from libegg.
* Installing the library means people are going to use it and depend on
it, no matter how many #defines they have to put in their code :)
* It also means we have to make regular releases of libegg, which is
more work for the maintainer(s).
* libegg is a highly unstable module that's guaranteed to break both API
and ABI compat which means that a change in libegg could break a lot of
applications.
* Most of the things that are used regularly are probably ready to go
into gtk+ and the gnome libraries.
That's all I can think of for now. There's probably more though :)
Anders
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]