Re: [Usability]Re: GNOME personas

On Tue, 2002-12-24 at 18:07, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 01:09:40PM +0000, Andrew Sobala wrote: 
> > I would be wary of constricting the short-term GNOME audience like this.
> > I cannot see why it would be anything but advantageous to do our best to
> > design for all personas, without the "We don't need to worry about this
> > being confusing to Steve, he's not a primary persona" attitude that
> > could arise by having primary personas.
> > 
> Did you read the book? If you didn't, go read it, and then worry about
> it. ;-) Don't worry about it yet.

Hey, where can I get it on Christmas Eve ;-) ? I think personas is a
great idea, I was just objecting to having personas that "aren't
important to design for yet." On re-reading what you wrote (that got
snipped from the thread), I may have misinterpreted you.

                 Merry Christmas,


Version: 3.1
GS/M d--(-) s: a17 C++(+++) UL+ P++ L+++ E--- W+>++ N(-) o? K? w--(---) !O M V-
PS+ PE Y+ PGP+>++++ t@ 5-- X- R tv-@ b++++ DI+++ D>---- G- e- h! r--- y?

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]