Re: who gets in and why, aka the GNOME Desktop inclusion criteria
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- To: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- Cc: Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>, Luis Villa <louie ximian com>, gnome-hacker gnome org, GNOME Desktop List <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: who gets in and why, aka the GNOME Desktop inclusion criteria
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 18:40:58 +1000
<quote who="Michael Meeks">
> On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 04:44, Seth Nickell wrote:
> > > I get so confused about the terminology surrounding the Gnome desktop
> >
> > The GNOME foundation should offer a 4 day intensive brainwashing session
> > so the uninitiated can pay to have their brains re-aligned to conform
> > with GNOME terminology.
>
> Do you think Gnome is a 'religious' technology ?
>
> If so, perhaps we could do it under grant from the 'Religious
> Technology Center'(TM) (RTC [1]). I understand they're particularly
> adept at that sort of thing, and so Dynametic(TM?) ;-)
>
> /me cowers from the advancing diversity trainers.
>
> ;-)
My suggestion to the Foundation would be to support some kind of award for
threads like this. Perhaps call it the "George Now Has a Girlfriend Memorial
Award".
- Jeff
--
"I think hot Chinese girls who kick ass are the wave of the future, as
far as films go." - Cody Russell
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]