Re: who gets in and why, aka the GNOME Desktop inclusion criteria
- From: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- To: Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>
- Cc: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>, Luis Villa <louie ximian com>, gnome-hacker gnome org, GNOME Desktop List <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: who gets in and why, aka the GNOME Desktop inclusion criteria
- Date: 29 Aug 2002 10:31:37 +0100
On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 04:44, Seth Nickell wrote:
> > I get so confused about the terminology surrounding the Gnome desktop
>
> The GNOME foundation should offer a 4 day intensive brainwashing session
> so the uninitiated can pay to have their brains re-aligned to conform
> with GNOME terminology.
Do you think Gnome is a 'religious' technology ?
If so, perhaps we could do it under grant from the 'Religious
Technology Center'(TM) (RTC [1]). I understand they're particularly
adept at that sort of thing, and so Dynametic(TM?) ;-)
/me cowers from the advancing diversity trainers.
;-)
Michael.
[1] - not to be confused with Real Time Clock [ a non-technology ]
--
mmeeks gnu org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]