Re: beagle r4011 - in trunk/beagle: beagled beagled/IndexingServiceQueryable search/Tiles

Hmmm,  I agree that completely new instances of beagle-search aren't
ideal, but they are quite light. I think that having multiple
instances of beagle-search really isn't bad, no doubt a unified system
would be better, but I really don't know where to start. If people are
really against the current system (launching new beagle-search
instances) I can disable it until we have a better solution, I just
found the 'find mail from' workflow so common for me that it was
almost imperative that it be available.

I await the general opinion. But I tend to find that even with big
queries, its hard to get beagle-search over a meg of real memory.

On 10/2/07, Joe Shaw <joe joeshaw org> wrote:
> Hi,
> On 10/2/07, Kevin Kubasik <kevin kubasik net> wrote:
> > On 10/2/07, D Bera <dbera web gmail com> wrote:
> > > - I am not sure starting a _new_ beagle-search is a good idea. It
> > > should search in that same one. I dont use that UI much (actually,
> > > never) so you might want to get some feedback about this.
> >
> > I'm inclined to use this manor, as I don't like beagle-search losing
> > my old search, although its pretty trivial to use one or the other,
> > whatever the consensus on the list is will be my course of action.
> It's worth investigating how hard it would be to have beagle-search
> open multiple search windows per instance.  Right now there's no other
> way to do it, but firing up another instance of beagle-search is
> gross.
> Joe

Kevin Kubasik

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]