Re: RFC: Ideas for preferences dialog

[cyberdork33 <cyberdork33 gmail com>]

I am not really helping with development any, but I think having it 
portable to Windows is a good thing to keep in mind. OSX has Photobooth, 
but it might be nice to have there too.

James Liggett wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 23:40 +0300, Stefan Kost wrote:
> > GConf as such is not that poirtable (or it won't make sense). But unless someone 
> > plans to port Cheese to Mac or Win32, just ignore my comment.
> Based on some quick googling, it seems your point is perfectly valid. I
> honestly have no idea what our broader portability priorities are. As it
> stands now, we just use GConf directly, so anyone wanting to port to Mac
> or Windows would probably need to rip out CheeseGConf and reimplement it
> anyway. We don't have the fancy backend stuff like Buzztard does ;)
>
> To all: Seeing that Stefan brought it up, it might be worth asking
> before I make changes: Do we want to make portability to non Unix
> platforms a priority here? I think it would be wise if we covered our
> bases and did so. If this is the case I will (grudgingly) leave
> CheeseGConf as-is for now. 
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cheese-list mailing list
> Cheese-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/cheese-list