Re: Joliet extensions and files with no filename extension

[Mike Jones <mrjones69 gmail com>]

No problem. And there's some overloading of the "libisofs" name.
Looks like several projects all have their own version/flavor of it.

At the moment I'm on a RHEL7 system.
The brasero 3.12.1 program is using 
/usr/lib64/brasero3/plugins/libbrasero-libisofs.so

I tried the xorriso, version 1.4.4 (and it reports using its own 
libisofs version 1.4.4).
It too works as expected with no dot added.

Starting to look like the brasero version of "libisofs" is the 
odd-library out?


On 7/21/2016 6:10 AM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> somebody said "libisofs". I'm its developer.
>
> I am not aware that it would put a dot at the end of a Joliet name.
> Testing with the recent release 1.4.4:
>
>    # Create some file
>    touch abcdefghijklmnop
>
>    # Pack it up in an ISO
>    xorriso -as mkisofs -o test.iso -J --norock -no-pad abcdefghijklmnop
>
> and then looking into  test.iso  by a hex dumper:
>
>    0000b060 :  01  00  00  01  20  00  61  00  62  00  63  00  64  00  65  00
>                                         a       b       c       d       e
>
>    0000b070 :  66  00  67  00  68  00  69  00  6a  00  6b  00  6c  00  6d  00
>                 f       g       h       i       j       k       l       m
>
>    0000b080 :  6e  00  6f  00  70  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00
>                 n       o       p
>
> No dot to see. (It's 16 bit UCS-2. Thus the 0s between each ASCII character.)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Could you please determine the .so version number of libisofs ?
> E.g.
>    /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libisofs.so.6.76.0
>
> And test whether libisofs underneath xorriso shows the problem ?
> E.g by:
>
>    xorriso -as mkisofs -o test.iso --iso-level 2 -R -J ...your.directories.or.files...
>
> If so, please determine its version
>
>    xorriso -version
>
> which should say something like
>    ...
>    xorriso version   :  1.4.4
>    ...
>    libisofs   in use :  1.4.4  (min. 1.4.4)
>
> I tried on Debian 8 with xorriso-1.4.4 and 1.3.2 without seeing the dot yet.
>
>
> Have a nice day :)
>
> Thomas