This contains the second mockup in PNG format. On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 19:19 +0000, Matt Sturgeon wrote: > I have attempted to reply with an amended mopckup, however due to the > size (over 40kb) it is "waiting for moderator's approval". > > I will attempt to follow up this email with one containing a PNG and one > containing an XCF. > > Thanks for your comments. > > On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 19:32 +0100, Michał Sawicz wrote: > > Dnia 2010-12-10, pią o godzinie 21:04 +0000, Matt Sturgeon pisze: > > > Attached is an updated mockup. > > > > Why do you want such a big progress slider? I always had the impression > > that such progress bars have limited resolution and precision wasn't > > their purpose. Also, whenever you'd want to seek, you'd have to locate > > the place where the slider is across the whole width of your desktop. > > > > I'm all for decreasing the toolbar size, but your ideas seem to break > > some things user might be used to. That's not wrong in itself, but IMO > > the playback buttons + time indicator look a bit chaotic. And you've > > just used ~ 5% of screen height just for the progress bar. Kinda wastes > > what you've gained removing the status bar. > > > > I think the progress slider and time indicators belong together > > somewhere. Maybe they'd fit nicely over the sources list? Maybe even > > along with the playback buttons? Then again there'd be a huge gaping > > space between track details and the right side buttons. > > > > Just my 2c. >
Attachment:
BansheeMockup2.png
Description: PNG image
