Re: Reply-to-all, include yourself (or maybe not)

[Steffen Klemer <masterofheap gmx net>]

Am 2005.04.01 22:07 schrieb(en) Albrecht Dreß:
> Am 01.04.05 21:30 schrieb(en) Steffen Klemer:
> > It doesn't work when there is more than one of my addresses
>   ^^^^ Ummm - I'm actually to dumb to understand what you mean here :-/  
> Maybe you can give me an example of received "Reply-To:", "From:", "To:"  
> and "Cc:" headers, and the expected result vs. what my patch produced?
>
> What the algorithm does now (better: *should* do now): the "To" address  
> of the reply message is taken from the received "Reply-To:" field or, if  
> that one is missing, from the "From:" field.
>
> The "Cc:" list is then composed as a concatenation of all addresses  
> found in the received "To:" and "Cc:" lists. For each element within  
> this lists, the Internet address part is compared according to RFC 2821  
> with the internet addresses of *all* identities. If they are equal  
> (which in '2821 terms means that "local-part domain" is equal if the  
> local-parts are case sensitive equal, but the domain case-insensitive!),  
> the particular address will not be added. At least this is the theory,  
> and I couldn't see where it should fail....

Okay ignore that silly argument - one has to start the freshly compiled  
version and not the one lying in /usr/local/bin... ;)

Sorry and thanks for your work!


cu
/Steffen

--
 /"\
 \ /  ASCII Ribbon Campaign    |  "The best way to predict
  X  * NO HTML/RTF in e-mail   | the future is to invent it."
 / \ * NO MSWord docs in e-mail|                -- Alan Kay

Attachment: pgpqrLAaQcBOG.pgp
Description: PGP signature