Re: Filter apply rules (was Re: BALSA 2.0.7 bugs)
- From: Emmanuel <e allaud wanadoo fr>
- To: Peter Bloomfield <PeterBloomfield bellsouth net>
- Cc: Pawel Salek <pawsa theochem kth se>,Emmanuel <e allaud wanadoo fr>, GTS <s rivoir gts it>,balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Filter apply rules (was Re: BALSA 2.0.7 bugs)
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 16:40:34 -0400
Le 2003.02.11 14:29, Peter Bloomfield a écrit :
> On 2003.02.11 13:10 Pawel Salek wrote:
> [ snip ]
>> Hm, I wonder: would anyone be interested in applying filter to
>> messages flagged as deleted?
>
> Surely not! A deleted but not yet expunged message is just
> deadwood--ignore it! Undeleting it is easy enough, if the filter
> really should apply to it.
>
>> Would it not be best just to exclude deleted messages from filters
>> at all?
>
> Absolutely!
>
>> Or from the filters that move messages around, or delete them (hm,
>> this sounds bit inconsistent)?
>> Pawel
>
> No, no, keep it simple--apply filters to undeleted messages only.
>
I'd vote for simplicity also. But there is the possibility to filter
doing the match on the messages flag (even the deleted one) : so do we
forget this possibility (ie no match on deleted flag) or do it as an
exception?
Bye
Manu
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]