Re: BalsaIndex ported to GtkTreeView
- From: Emmanuel <e allaud wanadoo fr>
- To: balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: BalsaIndex ported to GtkTreeView
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 12:54:46 +0200
On 10.07.2002 13:12 Peter Bloomfield wrote:
> On 2002.07.09 11:44 Emmanuel wrote:
> [ snip ]
>> I have not actually read the code, just your comments about the speed
>> concerns. If I understand well, moving messages has to be done the hard
>> way (sic ;-) because of the insufficiencies of GtkTreeView.
> Either that, or I'm missing an obvious way to do it!
>> Perhaps should we ask to the gtk+ developpers for this feature,
> I'm looking at the gtk+ code right now to get a sense of how big a job
> it would be.
>> moreover I'm sure we're not the only one to need this.
> You're right:
>> If this is not planned as a new feature for the GtkTreeView, the idea
>> to speed the threading (I think this is the worst problem) to do it in
>> two stages : a light structure keeping all relevant datas for the
>> threading (perhaps only a ref. ), and after fill the Tree.
> That works for the initial threading, but we also need to rethread when
> new messages arrive, preferably without rebuilding the tree from
> scratch. We *could* go to separate methods for each action, but that
> would be annoying! All in all, getting the natural capabilities into the
> gtk+ code seems like the better route.
This is also what I think. This only concerns the storing object I guess.
] [Thread Prev