Re: Balsa: Indirect linking to OpenSSL via LGPL and OpenLDAP libs
- From: Steffen Klemer <masterofheap gmx net>
- To: balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Balsa: Indirect linking to OpenSSL via LGPL and OpenLDAP libs
- Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 09:20:19 +0100
Am 2002.12.21 05:25 schrieb(en) Andrew Lau:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 09:31:27PM -0500, Peter Bloomfield wrote:
> > IMHO, it's enough to get explicit consent from the listed authors of
> > Balsa 2, and air the question on the list, as you have. Anyone who
> > contributed code to earlier versions, and might conceivably have an
> > objection, is bound to have become aware of the issue.
> > So what date are we looking at for Balsa's license change? When
> comes out?
To come to an end with this, perhaps Andrew could post a Mail-draft to the
List and if nobody has any strong disagreement sb. should send it to all
the people from AUTHORS.
And if nobody sends in say 2 weeks a disagreement, everything should be ok
to add the exception of the GPL.
I don't think it would be a short term solution to switch to gnutls, or?
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Human Knowledge
X * NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | Belongs
/ \ * NO MSWord docs in e-mail| To The World!
] [Thread Prev