Re: Balsa Encrypts messages with GnuPG!
- From: Oliver Oberdorf <oly tkk att ne jp>
- To: balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Balsa Encrypts messages with GnuPG!
- Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 20:29:29 +0900
With all respect,
I don't think balsa will be free of mutt for some time. People have wanted
PGP support in balsa for *ages*. Others have repeatedly shot down the
idea of using lubmutt's PGP with this argument, but /nobody/ has time to do
it this way and libmutt seems to still very much a part of balsa. Now that
someone is 90% done with the obvious approach, I see no reason to stop
him.
Plus, mutt is time-tested and I see no reason to think a from scratch
implementation will work better. More flexible for developers; maybe.
Better integrated with gnome PGP; obviously. Ready in 3 months or
less; not likely.
Anyway, as for the libbalsa approach:
It seems to support both encrypt-it-all and encrypt-each-attachment
(PGP/MIME). PGP/MIME is obviously preferred, but decrypting both
styles might be good, if it is easy to handle both.
Regards,
-Oly
P.S. Alan's signature verified in kmail (I'm so ashamed!)
On Wednesday 03 January 2001 18:35, Brian Stafford wrote:
> Rather than trusting libmutt to do the right thing and for more background
> on how to do this sort of thing, try reading RFC 1847 "Security Multiparts
> for MIME: Multipart/Signed and Multipart/Encrypted" and RFC 2015 "MIME
> Security with Pretty Good Privacy (PGP)". These documents and the ones
> they reference provide everything needed to implement a solution from
> scratch. I always find that the standards are more informative than reading
> source code which is usually wrong, incomplete or buggy, despite the
> authors' best intentions.
>
> This is not to put down libmutt or the PGP code using it, I felt the issue
> needs raising because of the nature of some of the queries raised here.
>
> In any case, I thought Balsa was moving away from the use of libmutt. A
> better solution might be to use gmime and pgg and avoid using libmutt.
> It should be noted that S/MIME uses exactly the same MIME structures as
> PGP/MIME so this would be easy to add into such a framework. (I have
> written code to do S/MIME in the past. I don't have time right now, but I
> may be able to contribute in this area in the future.)
>
>
> --
> Brian Stafford
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> balsa-list mailing list
> balsa-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]