Re: Discuss GNOME.Asia program





On 12 April 2012 08:28, Max <sakanamax hotmail com> wrote:
This year, we just have limit budget, so maybe workshop is a good idea ^^

I don't know how this is going.
as far as I know, 5 days of workshops is just too much.

Max, do you have so many requests to BoFs/workshops already? Can we have the updated schedule? Budget distribution will only be planned accordingly. How many sponsors you have in hand.
We cannot work without knowledge of how many speaker requests we have. Actually all of this will go hand in hand. Is there something you know which we don't know?

Please share all data if you wish everyone to think and work together.

 


On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Chandni Verma <chandniverma2112 gmail com> wrote:


On 12 April 2012 06:25, Haggen So <haggenso gmail com> wrote:
As for hackfest, please refer to http://mail.gnome.org/archives/asia-summit-list/2012-March/msg00022.html

Yes, I remember!
Actually if a hack-fest is organized, I'll be sure to attend the event!

We'll get one more sponsor this way too.

 


On 12 April 2012 02:17, Chandni Verma <chandniverma2112 gmail com> wrote:


On 11 April 2012 22:51, Chandni Verma <chandniverma2112 gmail com> wrote:
Honestly, did you have anything in mind for the rest of the dates before declaring them?
Max? ping^

Hackfests possible?
Freeform sessions/brainstorming before hackfests? These generate cool new application and technology ideas too.
Haggen & Sammy ping^


On 11 April 2012 20:11, Chandni Verma <chandniverma2112 gmail com> wrote:
In reference to this conversation, and the proposal by John and friends, I think we should reserve a day or two for Workshops and BOFs.

I also suggest we can arrange for tickets for some entertainment/cultural events popular in Hong Kong in the evenings (after heavy presentations) if any happens to be coinciding with the dates.

If we get any custom sponsor sponsoring for some party, we can fit it in the schedule as it comes.

Can we be open to non-gnome or non-desktop related presentations from IT/scientific/robotic departments enthusiastic about open-source or who want to attract the desktop-developers' attention (which will mostly also want to be sponsors)?


Cheers,


On 4 April 2012 15:00, Chandni Verma <vchandni gnome org> wrote:
Dear Haggen,

Keeping this conversation in mind, I was thinking if we could have our program schedule displayed on the event website.

Something like what we had for desktop summit last year: https://www.desktopsummit.org/program

That will make things transparent.


Regards,
Chandni


On 4 April 2012 14:52, Chandni Verma <vchandni gnome org> wrote:
Dear Aleksander,

Your have got some cool core topics to discuss which I am sure will attract a lot of developers.
Thanks for your interest and since your dates are also flexible we'll try best to fit in these into schedule.

Cheers,

Chandni Verma
GNOME.Asia Committee

On 3 April 2012 16:41, Aleksander Morgado <aleksander lanedo com> wrote:
Hey,

>
> Nothing has been planned yet. Your suggestion is very much welcomed.
> Please let us know more.

I was just thinking a 1h/2h BoF about ModemManager (both users and
developers welcome) could fit well, I could handle this on
Saturday/Sunday/Monday/Tuesday.

If anyone interested, I could also handle a BoF about Tracker.

On 11 April 2012 19:22, Chandni Verma <chandniverma2112 gmail com> wrote:
Everyone,

Refer to: http://2012.gnome.asia/schedule/

Declared event dates are 9th - 15th June.

We have schedule planned only for 9th and 10th of June as of now.

Its high time, we should start planning for the activities we want for the remaining days (11th - 15th June)


Suggestions?


On 9 April 2012 14:51, Haggen So <haggenso gmail com> wrote:
On 9 April 2012 17:13, Emily Chen <emilychen522 gmail com> wrote:
> Hi Haggen,
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Some questions:
> 1. Do we plan the schedule for 1 day or two days ?

2 days. This is just a template for both days.

> 2. I would suggest to put the lightning talk into one room, combine as
> one session, usually in the biggest room. Most people will attend
> Lightning talk session, it is lots of fun.  So separate into two
> lightning tracks will make people hard to choose which room to stay.
> Lightning talk can be consider as a close session for that day. So we
> can remove 1 lightning track and 1 community track at the same time.

Ok. Done

> -Emily
>
> 2012/4/9 Haggen So <haggenso gmail com>:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I combined (hopefully) the suggestions above and created a schedule at
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtOcgi7_K1ULdGZCTWNuNnVXWDhkVmh4ZXZZeDc2NWc
>>
>> Please check.
>>
>> Haggen
>>
>> On 9 April 2012 11:54, Emily Chen <emilychen522 gmail com> wrote:
>>> Good idea, yes, we should have a opening session to introduce
>>> GNOME.Asia Summit history and background.
>>>
>>> -Emily
>>>
>>> 2012/4/6 Will LaShell <will lashell net>:
>>>> We could combine the Summit introduction  with the first keynote. Say 15 to 30 minutes of conference introduction and then lead right into the Keynote.
>>>>
>>>> Will
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 6, 2012, at 5:22 AM, Emily Chen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would suggest we make the program more flexible. Every year, the
>>>>> program will change from time to time.  Even the last minute.  For
>>>>> example, 2011 in Banglore, the 2 days program became a 1.5 days
>>>>> because of an important match in Indian.
>>>>>
>>>>> So it doesn't matter if the schedule didn't look like what on the
>>>>> brochure at all.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would propose to make it more flexible, based on the GNOME and
>>>>> GNOME.Asia  tradition , our preferences are:
>>>>> 1. Prepare 3 tracks, 2 tracks are technical talks, and one track for
>>>>> community meet up. Not sure if we have 3 rooms at the same time.
>>>>> 2. 30 mins or 45 mins or 1 hours, both works, it depends on the number
>>>>> of talks we accept.
>>>>> 3. Tea time is a good idea, if we found sponsors, that would be great;
>>>>> Even we have no sponsors for the the tea, we can call it "Booth time",
>>>>> to gather people to the booth and encourage them to communicate.
>>>>> 4. I prefer 1 (or 2) keynote(s) in the morning and 1 keynote in the
>>>>> afternoon. We can arrange the morning keynote in the beginning of the
>>>>> day, and afternoon keynote after the "Tea time".
>>>>>
>>>>> We would like to hear Sammy and Haggen's opinion, they know the local
>>>>> culture well, their opinions are matter.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Emily
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2012/4/6 Max <sakanamax hotmail com>:
>>>>>> Dear Chandni and ALL:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Chandni Verma
>>>>>> <chandniverma2112 gmail com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Max,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 6 April 2012 11:21, Max <sakanamax gmail com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dear ALL:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> According the proposal
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://live.gnome.org/GnomeAsia/2012Summit/Bids?action="">
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We will have
>>>>>>>> * 3 Keynoes ( GNOME 3.4 | The GNOME Foundation | Platium Sponsor  )
>>>>>>>> * 14 talks ( 2 tracks | each 7 talks )
>>>>>>>> * 12 Lighting talks ( 2 tracks | each 6 [ 5 mins / 30 min])
>>>>>>>> for one day
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you think everything will fit in the time span, it looks good!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think you can have a better dividing the day in 1 hour spans.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think the question is " How many real time we will give to speaker"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In Taiwan We always give  "tea time"  in the morning( about 10:30 -
>>>>>> 11.00 ) and afternoon ( 15:00 - 15:30 )
>>>>>>
>>>>>> everybody could reference
>>>>>>
http://coscup.org/2011/en/program/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are some reason
>>>>>> 1. People could go booth ( GNOME booth and sponsor booth <-- It's very
>>>>>> important ), And the sponsor will be happy.
>>>>>> 2. It could be buffer ( If some session delay we could use tea time to
>>>>>> adjust it)
>>>>>> 3. People could talk and exchange to each other ( if you just listen
>>>>>> and see the talk for 3 or 6 hours, people always getting tired), I
>>>>>> think they need exercise and rest( for good quality )
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If we decide give speaker real 30 mins
>>>>>> for the time block We should have 35 - 40 mins
>>>>>> ---- Because session host must find out the speaker, and speaker will
>>>>>> test their Notebook
>>>>>> ---- People maybe want to change room for different session
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If we decide give total time 30 mins for all of these
>>>>>> ---- We should have tee time block to buffer
>>>>>> ---- We should tell speaker, maybe they just have 20 or 25 mins ( And
>>>>>> host must find out the speaker ^^ )
>>>>>> ---- Host will introduce the speaker and speaker will test their
>>>>>> Notebook, it will spend 5 mins
>>>>>> ---- People may ask some question if they interest the topic
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does it make sense?
>>>>>> Please give some suggestion ^^
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Should we create the program page now? ( we must discuss it ^^)
>>>>>>>> *But we must confirm ( for program page)
>>>>>>>> -- 2 tracks session
>>>>>>>> ---- Basic 2 tracks and 2 rooms
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- how many rooms we have?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ----how big,Room number( It's not important now !!)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Depending on an estimate number of students attending!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ----We should send the document to CityU as soon as possible
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- how many Platium Sponsor?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> as many as we can get! :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----It depend our call for sponsor, I mean if our platium sponsor
>>>>>>>> increase, we must adjust some block
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- Is it a good idea put some key notes in afternoon ?  ( After Lunch )
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think, keynotes should be at the beginning of the event.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We need more suggestion for keynotes.
>>>>>> If someone just want to listen keynotes, they will left in the afternoon.
>>>>>> If someone just want to listen some topic, they will come in the afternoon.
>>>>>> We must keep people stay in conference. ( I think )
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------ I mean   2 keynotes  and 4 talks in the morning  1 keynote and
>>>>>>>> 10 talks in the afternoon
>>>>>>>> ------ Does it make sense, I think if we put all talk in the afternoon
>>>>>>>> - maybe some people will come in the after noon -- and we could have
>>>>>>>> two type (keynotes and talk) for half day
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We should send the document to CityU as soon as possible ^^
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Feel free to make adjustments to the letter I drafted to needs but when it's
>>>>>>> done, please get it confirmed from either Emily, Brian or Karen.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Max
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> _/_/  openSUSE Ambassador - Taiwan _/_/
>>>>>>>> _/_/  mail: sakanamax_at_gmail.com   _/_/
>>>>>>>> _/_/  twitter: sakanamax                     _/_/
>>>>>>>> _/_/  nickname: sakana                      _/_/
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> asia-summit-list mailing list
>>>>>>>> asia-summit-list gnome org
>>>>>>>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/asia-summit-list
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Chandni Verma
>>>>>>> www.chandniverma.blogspot.com
>>>>>>> IRC: glassrose [on irc.gnome.org and FreeNode]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> asia-summit-list mailing list
>>>>>>> asia-summit-list gnome org
>>>>>>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/asia-summit-list
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Max
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> asia-summit-list mailing list
>>>>>> asia-summit-list gnome org
>>>>>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/asia-summit-list
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> asia-summit-list mailing list
>>>>> asia-summit-list gnome org
>>>>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/asia-summit-list
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> asia-summit-list mailing list
>>>> asia-summit-list gnome org
>>>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/asia-summit-list
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> asia-summit-list mailing list
>>> asia-summit-list gnome org
>>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/asia-summit-list
>> _______________________________________________
>> asia-summit-list mailing list
>> asia-summit-list gnome org
>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/asia-summit-list
> _______________________________________________
> asia-summit-list mailing list
> asia-summit-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/asia-summit-list
_______________________________________________
asia-summit-list mailing list
asia-summit-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/asia-summit-list



--
Chandni Verma
www.chandniverma.blogspot.com
IRC: glassrose [on irc.gnome.org and FreeNode]




--
Chandni Verma
www.chandniverma.blogspot.com
IRC: glassrose [on irc.gnome.org and FreeNode]




--
Chandni Verma
www.chandniverma.blogspot.com
IRC: glassrose [on irc.gnome.org and FreeNode]




--
Chandni Verma
www.chandniverma.blogspot.com
IRC: glassrose [on irc.gnome.org and FreeNode]


_______________________________________________
asia-summit-list mailing list
asia-summit-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/asia-summit-list



_______________________________________________
asia-summit-list mailing list
asia-summit-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/asia-summit-list




--
Chandni Verma
www.chandniverma.blogspot.com
IRC: glassrose [on irc.gnome.org and FreeNode]


_______________________________________________
asia-summit-list mailing list
asia-summit-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/asia-summit-list



_______________________________________________
asia-summit-list mailing list
asia-summit-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/asia-summit-list




--
Chandni Verma
www.chandniverma.blogspot.com
IRC: glassrose [on irc.gnome.org and FreeNode]



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]