Re: GNOME.Asia 2011 Event Survey

[Frederic Muller <fredm gnome org>]

Changes applied. I had to deactivate the survey to modify one of the 
responses. I didn't reactivate it.

Fred

On 06/07/2011 11:13 PM, Pockey Lam wrote:
> Hi Fred,
>
> Thanks for your feedback and helping out to modify the survey.
>
>
> On 06/07/2011 10:47 PM, Frederic Muller wrote:
> > Some suggestions:
> > Do we need to have "Choose one of the following answers" for each
> > question?
>
> I donno how to remove the sentence (it's generated automatically)
>
> > Question 2:
> > What is your age?
> >
> > what about?
> > How old were you at the time of the event (April 2&3)?
>
> Let's change to how old are you then
>
> > Question 3:
> > Which of the following categories best describes your primary area of
> > employment?
> >
> > should be:
> > Which industry best describes your primary area of work?
> >
> > also we should remove "New answer option" somewhere in the middle
>
> agreed
> > Question 4:
> > I would replace the 3 options for North, Central and South America by
> > 'The Americas'
>
> agreed
>
> > Question 5:
> > Where city/country are you from?
> >
> > Confusing phrasing: people will give either one or both and it will be
> > hard to make automatic stats out of it.
> > Also it should be "which"
>
> let's specify only city, the city where they come from to join the
> conference
>
> > Question 7:
> > Should read: "Please rate your training session satisfaction level"
> >
> > Same comment for "Were you satisfied with the talks?", should be
> > "please rate the talks you attended satisfaction level"?
> > -> since there are other question about other aspects of the summit we
> > should add a footnote stating "more questions about various aspect of
> > the summit are asked later. Please only rate the talks."
>
> agreed
>
> > "Were you satisfied with the following items" should be:
> > "please rate each individual item separately"
> > -> what are people rating exactly when it comes to each individual
> > track? the talks there, the room, the on-time schedule, the work of
> > the volunteers? Maybe we should clarify as well.
>
> agreed
>
> > (I lost track of question numbers)
> > Which booth impressed you most?
> > =>
> > Which booth impressed you THE most?
>
> agreed
>
> > "Please specify your experience with your selected platforms in the
> > box(es). " -> I find this confusing as I was expected to say whether I
> > was proficient or casual user ('experience'). I think we can do
> > without that footnote.
>
> agreed, let's remove the footnote
>
> > Can we add LXDE to the list of free desktop environments as well?
>
> let's add LXDE
>
> > "Why did you choose your current operating system?"
> > -> We should ask them to specify what OS they use as well, else it
> > will be hard to know which reason applies to which OS...
>
> We cannot add / remove question once the survey is activated:
> let's use:
> What OS are you using? Why did you choose your current operating system?
> put the questions in 1 question.
>
> > Do you have any suggestions for improving GNOME 3.0?
> > -> suggestion should be singular (I think we have the same typo
> > elsewhere before this one)
>
> agreed
>
> > What did you like and dislike most about GNOME?
> > if using past it should be about the summit, else we should use
> > present tense.
>
> agreed , let's use present tense
>
> > http://gnome.asia is currently redirecting to 2011.gnome.asia. So what
> > does the question "Have you visited the http://gnome.asia website? "
> > and the next one trying to figure out? do we want feedback about the
> > summit 2011 site, or a community site which we don't have at all?
>
> we assume when the last time they visited the site is when they
> registered the event, it should be the summit 2011 site
>
> > Are you planning to join GNOME.Asia Summit next year?
> > -> this is a difficult question especially with 80% of students
> > attending. We don't even know where it will be. The cost involve to
> > attend is definitely THE limiting factor. I understand why we're
> > asking but...
>
> i think we can still keep the question even though they may not be able
> to attend for next year, but we can still have a feeling / statistic of
> how many % will consider to join again (without any specify constraint)
>
> thanks!
>
> > Nothing else.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Fred
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 06/05/2011 04:19 PM, Pockey Lam wrote:
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > The survey is ready to send out, please find the link as below, if there
> > > is any comment, please let me know before Monday.
> > >
> > > Please note that this survey will be send to every registrants of the
> > > event - around 1000 registrants, some of them didn't join the event,
> > > depending on whether they joined the event or not, they will answer
> > > different sets of questions, hence please feel free to try different
> > > answer(s) to test the survey, thanks!
> > >
> > > Link:
> > > http://survey.gnome.asia/index.php?sid=32785&newtest=Y&lang=en
> > >
> > > Timeline:
> > > Monday 6th June: feedback from committee
> > > Tuesday 7th June: survey to public / participants
> > > June : survey time
> > > Monday 3rd July: survey ends
> > > end of July : send out survey results / report
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Pockey
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > asia-summit-list mailing list
> > > asia-summit-list gnome org
> > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/asia-summit-list
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > asia-summit-list mailing list
> > asia-summit-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/asia-summit-list