Re: [anjuta-devel] Search Dialog in Anjuta 3.2?

[Sébastien Granjoux <seb sfo free fr>]

Hi Andreas,


Le 07/02/2012 23:21, Andreas Volz a écrit :
> For me these are the most important features I use:
Is it ordered by importance? I'm afraid we cannot improve everything at 
the same time.


> - *stable* gdb plugin
I suppose you mean that the current plugin is not stable enough. I have 
done a few improvements for Anjuta 3.4 for simple thing it looks like 
it's working. I have seen one bug report from you and I will be 
interested by more details.


> - autotools support (for parsing project)
Isn't it good enough now? I think Anjuta has the best autotools support 
than any other IDE.


> - search plugin
Ok


> - fast and good symbol browser
> (symbol browser was never good enough for me. No chance if you
> compare search quality with eclipse or cscope/kscope!)
> - jump to declaration/implementation of function (was in most cases not
>    working)
I don't use it very often but it seems to work here. From time to time I 
have to delete the .anjuta_sym_db.db file to recreate a good database 
but I don't use Anjuta as a normal user.


> - TODO plugin (possible to replace)
Ok, so it's more something nice to have.


> - *free* configurable editor colors
You can configure most of the color of the syntax highlight on Scintilla 
but the setting dialog was quite buggy. I have improved it for Anjuta 
3.4, so it should run fine now. Then for this bug 
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=669359, we need to add a 
preference somewhere but it shouldn't be a problem.


> - a good merging/diffing GUI (like integration of "meld") (also with
>    CSV support) would be a perfect dream! If you ever worked with
>    eclipse synchronize feature you know what I'm talking about.
I don't know what Anjuta can add by integrating "meld". But I haven't 
used eclipse synchronize, I will look at it.


> - I've *no* need to create libs, headers,... related to autotools
>    with a GUI. Easy use cases are ok, but the complex stuff will never
>    be supported by a wizard as it offers just to much possibilities. I
>    just edit Makefile.am with an editor.
My goal is to make it possible to write a complete project without 
knowing autotools, something equivalent to what you have on other IDE 
using other project formats. I think it's still not complete but I will 
not add a button for every feature of autotools. Indeed, for someone 
knowing autotools it is only nice to have if it's working well.


Regards,

Sébastien