Re: [xslt] XSLT 2.0



On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 05:12 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:

>   IMHO it's way to big,

It's for sure larger. One reason that it *looks* larger, though,
is that the specs are now much more precise, which implementors
have said they found helpful.

Another possibility is to implement XSLT 2 on top of an XQuery +
XPath 2.0 implementation such as dbxml, I suppose.

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]