Re: [xslt] Any interest in an alternative syntax for XSLT?

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:37:53PM +0200, Bjorn Reese wrote:
> Daniel Veillard wrote:
> 
> >  Is SLAX defined independantly ? Do you have stable pointers to the 
> >spec ? 
> 
> I do not think so. Is it a requirement for inclusion in libxml?

  At least prior peer-review before pushing code for a new syntax sounds
the bare minimum before generating a dependancy on it. It's very easy
to get syntactic sugar wrong, fixing it at that stage is relatively easy,
fixing it once code is deployed get insane, so I'm just careful there :-)

Daniel

-- 
Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard      | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine  http://rpmfind.net/