Re: [xslt] Any interest in an alternative syntax for XSLT?
- From: Bjorn Reese <breese mail1 stofanet dk>
- To: veillard redhat com, The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list <xslt gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [xslt] Any interest in an alternative syntax for XSLT?
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:37:53 +0200
Daniel Veillard wrote:
Is SLAX defined independantly ? Do you have stable pointers to the
I do not think so. Is it a requirement for inclusion in libxml?
I'm a bit worried. One safe thing would be to provide the code on
xmlsoft.org explaining how to integrate it even if not standard, then
proceed depending on feedback.
Or make it a non-standard option, compiled only on request, I'm
undecided, more feedback would be welcome.
Phil, does the SLAX implementation require access to internal parts of
libxml/libxslt, or is it built on top of the public APIs?
] [Thread Prev