Re: [xslt] how to enable xinclude for documents read bydocument()function

["Tom Frank" <tom zypsoft net>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Frank" <tom zypsoft net>
To: <veillard redhat com>; "The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list" 
<xslt gnome org>
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: [xslt] how to enable xinclude for documents read 
bydocument()function


> > On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 12:22:27AM -0700, Tom Frank wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > It appears that libxslt.setXIncludeDefault() api is no longer there. How 
> > > do
> > > I process xml docs having xinclude with document() function?
> > >
> > > My test xml/xsl files work  fine with  "xsltproc --xinclude" , but does 
> > > not
> > > work with pyxsltproc.py. I need to know how to make this work in python
> > > scripts (with pyxsltproc.py as a sample).
> > >
> > > I am using latest libxml2-2.6.19 and 
> > > libxslt-1.1.14/libxslt-python-1.1.14.
> >
> >  if doc is the instance to transform, use
> >    doc.xincludeProcessFlags(libxml2.XML_PARSE_NOENT |
> >                                            libxml2.XML_PARSE_DTDLOAD |
> >                                            libxml2.XML_PARSE_DTDATTR |
> >                                            libxml2.XML_PARSE_NOCDATA)
> >
> > before running the transformation on said instance.
>
> Hi, Daniel:
>
> I think the problem is with document() function. I use it like following 
> in my stylesheet:
>
>    <xsl:variable  name='mydoc' select='document("test.xml")'/>
>
> where test.xml contains xincludes. When 'test.xml' is read in as such, all 
> xinclude's are already lost.
>
> According to an old post by you , 
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/xslt/2001-June/msg00063.html.
> you have added this feature in 2001,  which I believe was 
> setXIncludeDefault() api (?). Besides this old post, I can't find any 
> other references to this api, why it is removed from current release and 
> what might have replaced it.
>
> A similar question on this list posted about three months ago went 
> unanswered, http://www.mail-archive.com/xslt gnome org/msg00102.html
Please ignore my previous post.  I  am losing my head after staring at this 
problem for way too long.

The real problem is simply that pyxsltproc.py has not been kept in sync with 
current libxslt api . If it can be updated to behave the same way as 
xsltproc, we'll be all set.
Sorry about the misunderstanding on my part.

Tom