Re: [xslt] [BUG] Win32, xsltproc, libxml, libxslt, <xsl:include/>

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 04:19:59PM +0200, Igor Zlatkovic wrote:
> > > * Replace all those silent functions with versions which return an error
> > > value, set up the wrappers for backward compatibility.
> >
> >   Basically if a function was returning void, I have no problem
> > to change its signature to return an int with a non-zero value indicating
> > an error condition . That's perfectly sane, would that work in this case ?
> 
> Sure, if a function can tell the caller that things went amiss, then the
> caller can take steps to handle the error, that much is true. The fact is
> that there is more than one function which needs this modification.

  I'm too optimistic :-)

> I have one question: Is xsltParseStylesheetProcess() planned to be able to
> return a valid stylesheet pointer different to NULL and thus invalidating
> the one it received as a parameter? The current code does not do this, but
> the comments and the type of the return value suggest that this at least was
> the intention.

  yes sounds fine. This function is mostly internal so doing this should
not break code,

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@redhat.com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/