Re: [xml] runtest mystery bug: name2.xml error case regression test
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: danielg teragram com
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] runtest mystery bug: name2.xml error case regression test
- Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 15:41:42 +0800
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 03:22:13PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 01:32:38AM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
[...]
Failing that, may I ask what system environment you're using to
test? At this point, I'm willing to set up a virtual machine to get
the reproducibility of this issue nailed down.
Fedora 17 x86_64, but I'm within the git tree checkout
[...]
I am gonna retry on a RHEL/Centos 6.3 setup to be sure
server:~/XML -> ./runtest
## Error cases regression tests
Total 11 tests, no errors
server:~/XML -> ./runtest
## Error cases regression tests
Total 11 tests, no errors
server:~/XML -> ./runtest
## Error cases regression tests
Total 11 tests, no errors
server:~/XML ->
CentOS 6.3 x86_64 still works for me within the git checkout...
BTW i had to do that change to build on 6.3 which doesn't have a
very recent auto*
--- a/configure.in
+++ b/configure.in
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
dnl Process this file with autoconf to produce a configure script.
-AC_PREREQ([2.68])
+AC_PREREQ([2.63])
AC_INIT
AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([entities.c])
AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([config.h])
Any reason why we can't go back to 2.63 instead of 2.68 ?
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel veillard com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]