Re: [xml] Submitting patches, list or bugzilla?
- From: Arnold Hendriks <a hendriks b-lex nl>
- To: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] Submitting patches, list or bugzilla?
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:17:15 +0100
On 10-11-2010 16:08, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:58:45PM +0100, Arnold Hendriks wrote:
Dear list,
I submitted a mingw32 compilation fix about a year ago
<URL:https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59924>, but it
hasn't been picked up yet.
Hum, is that the right bug ? doesn't look like it ...
Oops. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599241 - i dropped the 1
Is bugzilla the proper way to submit these patches (should I tag
them in a certain way to ensure they're not overlooked), or should I
send patches to the xml gnome org mailinglist ?
well patches should be put as attachments and tagged as patches if
using bugzilla. On the mailing-list that works too.
I cannot garantee a quick review on bugzilla, unless I happen to step
on the notice, on the list it's more likely, but I always look for
bugs with patches attached on bugzilla before making a release. I guess
your patch wasn't attached or flagged as a patch.
Ah. I overlooked the patch checkbox with the attachment. I'll make sure
that one is checked for any further patches then.
--
Arnold Hendriks<a hendriks b-lex nl>
Postbus 545, 7500 AM Enschede, The Netherlands
B-Lex IT B.V. Web: http://www.b-lex.com/
Phone: +31 (0)53 4836543 Mobile: +31 (0)6 51710159
KvK: 08174333 (Oost-Nederland) MSN: a hendriks b-lex nl
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]