Re: [xml] Submitting patches, list or bugzilla?
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: Arnold Hendriks <a hendriks b-lex nl>
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] Submitting patches, list or bugzilla?
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:08:50 +0100
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:58:45PM +0100, Arnold Hendriks wrote:
Dear list,
I submitted a mingw32 compilation fix about a year ago
<URL:https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59924>, but it
hasn't been picked up yet.
Hum, is that the right bug ? doesn't look like it ...
Is bugzilla the proper way to submit these patches (should I tag
them in a certain way to ensure they're not overlooked), or should I
send patches to the xml gnome org mailinglist ?
well patches should be put as attachments and tagged as patches if
using bugzilla. On the mailing-list that works too.
I cannot garantee a quick review on bugzilla, unless I happen to step
on the notice, on the list it's more likely, but I always look for
bugs with patches attached on bugzilla before making a release. I guess
your patch wasn't attached or flagged as a patch.
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel veillard com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]