Re: [xml] [Proposal] How about write a book for LibXML2?
- From: "Elvis Stansvik" <elvstone gmail com>
- To: veillard redhat com
- Cc: libxml2 <xml gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [xml] [Proposal] How about write a book for LibXML2?
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:02:03 +0100
2008/11/11 Elvis Stansvik <elvstone gmail com>:
2008/11/8 Elvis Stansvik <elvstone gmail com>:
2008/11/7 Elvis Stansvik <elvstone gmail com>:
2008/11/7 Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 09:25:55AM +0800, Yang Songxiang-a22301 wrote:
Hi, all,
I used the libxml2 package recently, found it's a perfect XML parser.
The example codes/document are good for a newcomer to use the LibXML2,
but they lack of enough detail information. I had to dig into the
sources code if I want more furthermore details. I think we can write a
bible book, give a complete introduction for LibXML2 package, not only
it's calling convention, but also including it's design framework.
I had been approached a few years ago about writing a libxml2 book,
but it's a lot of work, I didn't had the time (and not much more now)
and it was made relatively clear that financially that may not be very
interesting.
I don't have much time, so when i have some for libxml2 I prefer to
focuse on bugs or improvements that other contributors are less likely
to provide.
My draft idea:
1) Generate a DocBook framework,
2) Anyone can select a chapter that he/she interested.
3) Organize all chapters into a complete LibXML2 bible book.
I think this would help a lot for many C/C++ programmers who're the
first time using LibXML2, and would make LibXML2 more popular in C/C++
domain. Maybe the book can be published by O.Reilly if it's good enough.
:)
What's your opinions?
Sounds better than a wiki in my opinion, I'm fine adding this to CVS
and integrating patches to the docs as they come.
I think personally a wiki would be better, and then content could be
taken from that and integrated into a more "official" DocBook in CVS.
I heard you had tried setting up a wiki some years ago but had
problems with SPAM, but surely that's a problem that can be solved?
E.g. by only allowing e-mail confirmed registered users. Anything else
that speaks against a wiki? It would be easier to contribute, and
easier to make small fixes with less maintenance than sending patches,
IMHO.
Just to throw something out there, I sketched out a preliminary layout
that could be used (and of course improved upon) as a skeleton for a
DocBook or Wiki:
I have now taken the liberty and set up a MediaWiki installation and
started adding some content. It's available at:
http://libxml2wiki.dose.se
I'm blocking search engine robots in robots.txt at the moment.
As you can see I've styled the wiki to look similar to xmlsoft.org. If
you want the regular MonoBook skin, just change it in the preferences.
I have started to reconsider the structure of the main content (yet to
be written). Maybe it should be more task oriented and not sectioned
by the different APIs?
I also added created a tag extension so you can use e.g.
<api>xmlNode</api> and it will turn into a link to the libxml2 API
documentation. This extension uses information from the
libxml2-api.xml generated from libxml2 2.7.2 at the moment. I'm also
planning on patching the syntax highlighting extension I'm using to
automatically identify libxml2 symbols within <source /> tags and turn
them into API documentation links.
This has now been added, libxml2 API symbols used inside <source />
are now automatically turned into links to the API documentation.
Elvis
If anyone feel like helping out, just register and edit away! A simple
thing is to add installation instructions for your platform, as I've
only added it for the platforms I'm familar with.
Hope to get some response on this!
Daniel, what is xmlsoft.org running on? Would you consider again
making a wiki.xmlsoft.org for this? I'd be willing to maintain the
MediaWiki installation and handle security updates to it, as well as
combat any SPAM problems that might arise. The server I'm running this
on now is on a dynamic IP DSL line in Sweden, which is not really
optimal.
Regards,
Elvis
The libxml2 Library
Introduction
History
What is libxml2?
What libxml2 Is Not
libxml2 Architecture
Getting started
Installing libxml2
Binaries
Linux
Ubuntu / Debian
OpenSUSE
Fedora
Gentoo
FreeBSD
OpenBSD
Windows
MacOS X
Building from source
Download libxml2
Stable Version
Subversion
Configure Options
Building
Linux / BSD
Windows
MacOS X
Quick Start
Hello World
Building Your Program
The libxml2 APIs
Choosing the Right API
The Tree API
Introduction
Basic Example
Complex Example
Common Problems
The Reader API
Introduction
Basic Example
Complex Example
Common Problems
The SAX2 API
Introduction
Basic Example
Complex Example
Common Problems
The HTML API
Introduction
Basic Example
Complex Example
Common Problems
XPath API
Introduction
Basic Example
Complex Example
Common Problems
XPointer API
Introduction
Basic Example
Complex Example
Common Problems
XInclude API
Introduction
Basic Example
Complex Example
Common Problems
Utility APIs
String Handling
HTTP / FTP
XML and SGML Catalogs
String Dictionaries
Hash Tables
Putting It All Together
(Some more complex "task oriented" examples exercising
the various APIs and using XML found in the wild)
Validation
Introduction
DTDs
XML Schemas
RelaxNG
Schematron
Namespaces
Introduction
Basic Example
Complex Example
Common Problems
Error Handling
Introduction
Basic Example
Complex Example
Common Problems
Threads
Introduction
Thread Safety
Basic Example
Complex Example
Common Problems
Language Bindings
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby
Appendix
A See Also
B Acknowledgements
As you can see the sections for the various APIs are pretty sparse and
repetitive, with just an introduction to each API along with some
examples, the idea being that the current examples on xmlsoft.org can
be taken and improved upon, and as people (hopefully) contribute more
hands on and anecdotal information, those sections could be fleshed
out.
Any comments? I've probably left something out.
Are you dead against giving a wiki a try again Daniel? Even a
"registration required" one? If so, I could arrange this skeleton into
a DocBook XML instead and send it over.
Regards,
Elvis
Best Regards
-Scord
Motorola Software Center
[x] Public
[ ] Internal
[ ] Motorola Confidential Restricted
Heh, finally a smart non threatening way to label expected recipient
for mails issued by a corporation. Nice !
Yea I jumped at that too! Finally! :)
Regards,
Elvis
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel veillard com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
_______________________________________________
xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/
xml gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]