Re: [xml] file path vs URI [patch]

[Petr Sumbera <Petr Sumbera Sun COM>]

This is already solved (see attached our previous communication on this).

Thanks,

Petr

Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 05:09:29PM +0100, Petr Sumbera wrote:
> > Petr Sumbera wrote:
> >
> > > Please see my attached patch and consider changing libxml2 in similar 
> > > way. Any comments welcomed.
> > By changing libxml2 I meant something more intelligent then patch I sent 
> > does. Which is moving problem from "//" to "///" ;-)
>
>   Hitting the old unread mails. I'm not sure if the issue is still
> worth fixing and if yes, how ? The original patch looks wrong to me,
> fixing an URI handling problem in parser.c just can't be right.
>
> Daniel

--- Begin Message ---

• From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
• To: Petr Sumbera <Petr Sumbera Sun COM>
• Cc: xml gnome org
• Subject: Re: libxml2 Solaris issue
• Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 05:21:18 -0500

On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 10:22:13AM +0100, Petr Sumbera wrote:

Thank you! Can you please close this in bugzilla.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500664

  Sure, done, thanks !
Note that when providing a patch with a bug, provide it as an attachment
to the bug, this avoid to have it fell though the crack as there are queries
in bugzilla to spot bug reports with unreviewed patches, and I usually
try to check those before doing a release. The patch would probably have gone
in 2.6.31 if it had been attached to the bugzilla ... Oh well it's in now :-)

Daniel

-- 
Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard      | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine  http://rpmfind.net/

--- End Message ---