Re: [xml] file path vs URI [patch]
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: Petr Sumbera <Petr Sumbera Sun COM>
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] file path vs URI [patch]
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:31:32 -0400
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 05:09:29PM +0100, Petr Sumbera wrote:
Petr Sumbera wrote:
Please see my attached patch and consider changing libxml2 in similar
way. Any comments welcomed.
By changing libxml2 I meant something more intelligent then patch I sent
does. Which is moving problem from "//" to "///" ;-)
Hitting the old unread mails. I'm not sure if the issue is still
worth fixing and if yes, how ? The original patch looks wrong to me,
fixing an URI handling problem in parser.c just can't be right.
Daniel
--
Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
veillard redhat com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]