Re: [xml] xmllint --nowarning = no information



2006/10/11, Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 06:45:08PM +0200, Aron Stansvik wrote:
> 2006/10/11, Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>:
> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 09:02:20AM -0700, Bob Stayton wrote:
> > > Sure, try this test file with elements out of order:
> >
> >   Okay I see, very weird, I got this in xmlValidateOneElement
> >
> >     if ((ctxt != NULL) && (ctxt->warning != NULL)) {
> >
> > where the full debug is done and a reduced version in the else... No idea
> > why this ended this way, legacy and refactoring I guess :-)
> > Should be fixed in CVS now, thanks for the heads up !
>
> Bah! I started on the very same fix. You, my friend, are fast :)

  I have an URL for you ...

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?product=libxml2&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&email1=&emailtype1=substring&emailassigned_to1=1&emailreporter1=1&emailcc1=1&emaillongdesc1=1&email2=&emailtype2=substring&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailcc2=1&emaillongdesc2=1&changedin=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&short_desc=&short_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&long_desc_type=substring&bug_file_loc=&bug_file_loc_type=substring&status_whiteboard=&status_whiteboard_type=substring&keywords=&keywords_type=anywords&op_sys_details=&op_sys_details_type=substring&version_details=&version_details_type=substring&cmdtype=doit&newqueryname=&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&form_name=query

first at the bottom wins the right to be the maintainer for the next 2 years !

You're too kind!

:)



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]