Re: [xml] Documentation improvement suggestion

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 05:13:17PM +0200, Stefan Kost wrote:
> Hi Cory,
>
> the best IMHO would be to go back to gtk-doc, as this has been improved a 
> lot.

  you mean there is now a documentation on how do do the documentation,
how to build it and the perl code is commented ? Then I may look at
it when I have time or take a patch showing how to reintegrate it
along with the existing system. I completely wrote my documentation
tools forced after years of frustration with gtk-doc, a bare improvement
won't cut it, but as a parallel back-end if there is documentation about
it then why not.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/