Re: [xml] c14n

On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 06:13:53PM +0100, Martijn van Beers wrote:
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 11:38 -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 05:25:50PM +0100, Martijn van Beers wrote:
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 07:38 -0800, Aleksey Sanin wrote:
Then it fails in "relative namespace" check inside C14N
(see notes in section 2.1 of c14n spec:

from my reading of
"DAV:" is an absolute URL, not a relative one. Or am I misunderstanding

  According to my reading of RFC2396 it's not !

Indeed. however, I found*checkout*/ietf-uri/rev-2002/issues.html?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/html#014-empty-opaque_part

so it will be allowed in the future. Any chance of getting this specific
bit in before the new rfc gets published?

  Hum, currently the URI modules follows 2396, but 3986 is out which
obsoletes 2396,
   "This document obsoletes [RFC2396], which merged "Uniform Resource
    Locators" [RFC1738] and "Relative Uniform Resource Locators"
    [RFC1808] in order to define a single, generic syntax for all URIs.

 the uri.c module needs to be updated. Problem is that most XML specs
reference 2396 normatively ... Evolution of standard is always a hard issue.
I suggest you open an enhancement request in bugzilla.


Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Desktop team
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit | Rpmfind RPM search engine

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]