Re: [xml] Probably should not look for/use shl_load if dlopen is found (2.6.17)

# diff -c  xmlmodule.c.orig xmlmodule.c

  okay, makes sense. I made the changes, thanks !
  BTW patches are better sent as mail attachments so they don't
get messed up by the transport layers.

(BTW, I changed my subcription to rick jones2 hp com from rick_jones2 hp com, so the approval stuff should no longer be an issue - noticed it when I saw the delays.)

Inline vs attachements - every project seems to go differently there :( Some lists strip attachments, hard to keep it striaght which is which. All thanks to that OS that can't seem to ever shake a cold (virus)... sigh. I'll try to remember to do attachments in the future.

So, with those patches I get clean compiles for both 32 and 64-bit 11.11 and 11.23 IPF. I can though generate beaucoup warnings if I enable all warnings and migration (32 to 64-bit) warnings. The bulk of them seem harmless (having waded through them briefly) and some look like the compiler being overly paranoid, but some may be of interest. Would you like to see the entire list (as an attachment of course :)?

rick jones

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]