Re: [xml] Probably should not look for/use shl_load if dlopen is found (2.6.17)

On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 11:51:22AM -0800, Rick Jones wrote:
On some HP-UX systems, both dlopen and shl_load are present.  The 2.6.17 
configure script seems to look for both of them and then xmlmodule.c does 
not prefer one over the other.

When both shl_load and dlopen are present, we get duplicate definitions of 
the routines and that makes the compiler rather unhappy :)

I'm not sure which would be better - only have configure look for shl_load 
if it does not find dlopen, or modify the #ifdefs in xmlmodule.c such that 
the shl_load stuff is nested in an #else from the HAVE_DLOPEN.  This patch 
does the latter - as much because I didn't have autoconf installed on the 
HP-UX system as anything else :)

# diff -c  xmlmodule.c.orig xmlmodule.c

  okay, makes sense. I made the changes, thanks !
  BTW patches are better sent as mail attachments so they don't
get messed up by the transport layers.



Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Desktop team
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit | Rpmfind RPM search engine

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]