RE: [xml] About software patents in Europe and consequences

["Fred Smith" <fred computrition com>]

I'm not a European so there's little-to-no value in me contacting
members of the Europan Parliament.

But I'm as worried about it as Daniel is.

I urge all of you who do live or work in Europe (or work for European
employers) to get ON THE TELEPHONE to your MEP(s) and eloquently argue
against patents for any kind of software. Don't rant, plan out a logical
argument and deliver it.

Please!!!!!


> -----Original Message-----
> From: xml-bounces gnome org [mailto:xml-bounces gnome org] On Behalf
Of
> Daniel Veillard
> Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 6:41 AM
> To: xml gnome org; xslt gnome org
> Subject: [xml] About software patents in Europe and consequences
>
>   I updated the front page of xmlsoft.org to point to the current
state.
> In a nutshell, if there isn't strong opposition from the elected
european
> representatives, the directive toward legalizing Software Patents in
> Europe
> will pass.
>   I live in europe as well as some others libxml2 and libxslt
> contributors.
> This mean I/we could suddenly suffer from legal attack from
> companies who deposed patents about XML software processing, i.e. the
> software I provided under a very liberal licence for all to share may
turn
> into a risk for my work, and the assets I got though the result of my
> work.
> This is of course something I don't take lightly at all.
>
>   I noticed that among the companies who lobbied to get Software
Patents
> legalized in Europe, among others IBM, Apple, Cisco, Alcatel, Dell,
> Sun Microsystems, Bull, Intel, HP, Adobe, Fujitsu, SAP, Siemens, Sony
> and Motorola [1], a lot of them are using libxml2 and libxslt. Seems
as
> a thank you for I providing code, time and energy, all I get is being
> threaten for potential legal attacks.
>
>    I cannot accept this state of affairs.
>
>   If the Software Patent directive to legalize them in Europe passes
> on Wednesday (or later) I may have to change things. One of them could
> be to switch the Licence for the software:
>
>    - to LGPL which has a Patent protection clause
>    - to add patent attack protection to the Licence like sections
>      12 and 13 for the GPL, basically dropping all right to any
>      distribution and use in case of any legal attack
>    - or something else I will certainly have to ask a lawyer for
advices
>   This annoys me a lot, but I may need to defend myself. There are
> certainly
> other options like for example getting a formal statement from one of
> those companies that they would pay for the defense in case of legal
> attacks due to patents infrigements in Europe. If you work for one of
> those company and use libxml2 or libxslt you should raise this point
> to your hierarchy, because the status-quo is in danger, all I (we)
have
> left on our side is our CopyRight rights on this software and if
that's
> the only thing I can use to protect myself, I will use it, but to be
> able to use it I would have to change the License for future versions.
>
>   Don't try to persuade me that Software Patents are not intrinsically
> bad,
> I base my opinion on the current text being pushed without
Buzek-Rocard-
> Duff
> amendments and which just mirrors the sorry state of Software Patents
in
> the USA, and is indefendable in practice. It's not an ideologistic
view,
> it is a pragmatic one I can't risk to get patent infringement legal
bills
> that there is no way I could afford to pay, and there is no way I can
do
> or pay for potential patent infringement searches about all the XML
> processing aspects embbedded in libxml2 and libxslt.
>
>    I am very concerned about this, if you are in Europe, please call
your
> MEP to object this directive without the amendments suggested [2]. If
you
> work for one of the companies who paid for this being passed, you can
> contact your hierarchy now because there is something seriously broken
> I will have to react to, and in general if you have advices on how to
> handle this mess please provide them, publicly on the list or
privately
> if you wish so.
>
>   thanks for your attention,
>
> Daniel
>
> [1] list extracted from http://www.eicta.org/ who organized a lot of
>     the lobbying for legalizing Software Patents in Europe
>
> [2] see http://wiki.noepatents.eu.org/index.php/MEPinfo don't send
mail,
>     call them, mine is Rocard who worked on amendments to try to
correct
>     the situation ...
>
> --
> Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
> veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
> http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
> _______________________________________________
> xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
> xml gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the 
system manager. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of the company. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any 
attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this email.