Re: [xml] reporting bug for lixml2.2.6-8

[Bjorn Reese <breese mail1 stofanet dk>]

On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 10:36, Daniel Veillard wrote:

> So far they don't suggest any better way to do the operation fast
> and stick to the standard. Too bad, but it was a good idea to ask.

If this should ever emerge as a problem, then I am sure we can cook
up some acceptably fast method using 2-hashed signatures.