Re: [xml] reporting bug for lixml2.2.6-8

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 09:16:35PM +0200, Bjorn Reese wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 18:29, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>
> >   Okay, then libxml2 won't work on an implementation where this doesn't
> > work. More precisely  the dictionnaries won't work, which mean parsing speed
> > cost, and special compilation options. If we end up with a bug report for
> > such an architecture then we will take the appropriate measures. In the 
> > meantime the code will stay as it is.
>
> FYI, I have asked about the pointer comparison on comp.std.c. The URL
> for the discussion is:
>
>  
> http://groups.google.com/groups?threadm=pan.2004.08.30.17.56.51.790212%40see.signature

  Okay, thanks !
So far they don't suggest any better way to do the operation fast
and stick to the standard. Too bad, but it was a good idea to ask.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/