Re: [xml] RE: xml Digest, Vol 6, Issue 30

That may be true, but that really was not my point.  My point was, when you ask for free advice, you might get an answer..  You might not.

Ed Day <eday obj-sys com> wrote:
Isn't this off-list, priority support available through the Red Hat support
program that I have seen mentioned in the past?


Ed Day
Objective Systems, Inc.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Veillard"
To: "Murray Cumming"
Cc: ; "libxml-list"
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 6:18 AM
Subject: Re: [xml] RE: xml Digest, Vol 6, Issue 30

> On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 09:38:45AM +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > If someone needs help with libxml that they can't get for free, then
> > there is no reason that they can't pay someone for that support. There's
> > no need to use a different library.
> >
> > For instance, I will gladly take peoples' money.
> :-)
> But this is a serious issue. In the past I had been sometimes asked for
> suggestions on who could work on libxml2 . Maybe I should make a page
> with pictures and bios of the people behind libxml2/libxslt and the
> ecology of code around it, and there people who are interested in doing
> contract work on libxml2 could state so.
> yes, I really need to do this, I will see if I can make some time up
> this week-end for this. I'm serious about this, Igor, Kasimier, Aleksey,
> are also part of the people I should list on such a page.
> Daniel
> --
> Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team
> veillard redhat com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit
> | Rpmfind RPM search engine
> _______________________________________________
> xml mailing list, project page
> xml gnome org

Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]