Re: [xml] Proposal: xmlStr* functions get their own module

On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 03:13, Daniel Veillard wrote:
  Hum ... there is some logic there, the definition of xmlChar would
have to be moved, the tree.h and parser.h and possibly a number of 
other header would have to include this. At the C level it would
be better to also split the code in a separate .c module.
  That's cleanup, it kind of make sense, the negative point is that
it will change the documentation URLs for those functions, and it's
quite a bit of work without immediate improvement for most users. But
if you want to look into it, why not !


I actually consider the change in the documentation URLs to be a _good_
thing. Why should anyone (new) to libxml expect to find the xmlStr*
functions in the parser module?  Using the search engine won't be
affected by this change. If you look up, say, xmlStrdup. you'll just
find it on a different page (with a more appropriate name).

I'll do this one and submit the patches. Its pretty easy.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]