Re: [xml] Re: The DSO dilemna
- From: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming starnetworks us>
- To: Joel Reed <joelwreed comcast net>
- Cc: xml gnome org, Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [xml] Re: The DSO dilemna
- Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 08:31:28 -0700
Joel Reed wrote:
1) xmlmodule.h would be roughly what it is now
2) xmlmodule.c would use libltdl DSO API to implement
xmlModuleOpen, xmlModuleClose, etc.
This I agree 100% with; use ltdl internally, but create your own API/ABI
that users call. They don't even know that you are using ltdl to do the
work.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
