Re: [xml] Re: The DSO dilemna

Joel Reed wrote:

1) xmlmodule.h would be roughly what it is now
2) xmlmodule.c would use libltdl DSO API to implement xmlModuleOpen, xmlModuleClose, etc.

This I agree 100% with; use ltdl internally, but create your own API/ABI that users call. They don't even know that you are using ltdl to do the work.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]