Re: [xml] The DSO dilemna

Daniel Veillard wrote:

  Okay, now I'm faced with serious dilemna. What code base and API should
libxml2 use for dynamic loading of shared code. We have 2 code base:
    - Joel Reed proposal
    - ltdl.c

My vote goes to Joel's proposal, if and only if the xmlModuleSymbol API
is fixed to handle the valid NULL pointers.

I am not too concerned about missing some platforms if ltdl is updated.
We can just reimplement the same functionality in Joel's code; it's only
a minor effort.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]