Re: [xml] [PATCH] DSO/Module Support
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming starnetworks us>
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] [PATCH] DSO/Module Support
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 13:35:59 -0500
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 11:12:28AM -0700, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Joel Reed wrote:
The following patch implements a basic API for dynamically loading
shared objects (.so/.dll files).
Is there a specific reason why you are re-implementing the ltdl library
provided with libtool? It already knows all these platform specific
In general I appreciate reusing code, but ...
1/ ltdl.c + Makefile stuff looks way larger than the suggested patch.
2/ I'm not sure I like libtool in general and ltdl.c looks excruciatingly
complex (possibly this need to be that complex, but it's not likely)
3/ libltdl seems to be under the LGPL licence, which is significantly
different from MIT' one we are using
machinations, it can handle purely-static builds on platforms that
require it (or when the user chooses it), etc.
Since libxml2 already uses libtool, it seems that using libltdl would be
a simple addition.
would you candidate to fix problems in a timely fashion if we have
some with libltdl ?
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
veillard redhat com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]