Re: [xml] "Next XML schema implementation steps (poll)"

[Aamer Akhter <aakhter gmail com>]

On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:32:41 -0400, Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 10:52:41PM +0200, Torkel Lyng wrote:
> > What features are the XML-Schema part missing really?
>
>   Kasimier is the best person to answer, but I knw we are missing
> at least:
>   - content checking in derivations (I would have to implement
>     comparison at the regexps level first)
>   - identity constraints not based on ID/IDREF

Just to clarify, does the above include support for 'unique'? While ID
accomplishes some of the same things (enforces uniqueness), it has
some other naming constraints that unique does not require.

>  there is probably other parts though (do we have wilcards ?)
>   To me one of the important things somewhat missing is more
> systematic regression testing for the code in CVS, I know Kasimier
> have been using at least subset of the W3C testsuite [1] but
> this is not integrated in CVS right now (though the full set of
> the W3C Schemas types are tested though Relax-NG James Clark
> testsuite). But Kasimier is asking for features missing and what
> you want implemented, it's a relatively different matter.
>
> Daniel
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-test-collection/
> --
> Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
> veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
> http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
> xml gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml


-- 
Aamer Akhter / aakhter gmail com