Re: [xml] "Next XML schema implementation steps (poll)"

[Torkel Lyng <torkel thedisc no>]

What features are the XML-Schema part missing really?

On Monday 16 August 2004 13:56, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to the people out there using XML schemata with libxml2:
> it would be nice to hear from you about missing features that are badly
> needed.
>
> I don't want to give the impression that we ran out of points on our
> schedule, but at this point I'm more interested in adding constraints to
> the implementation than adding features (well, constraints are features
> but now highly visible ;-)); and this might contradict with the need of
> people. So please, think twice before trying to workaround a missing
> feature or bug, and let us know. Plus, add a bit of foresight for me,
> and take features, your are going to need in the near future, into
> accout as well... blablabla, you know what I mean.
>
> So in short: this is a poll about what to implement next.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Kasimier
>
> _______________________________________________
> xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
> xml gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml