Re: [xml] pb xsltproc path confusion with document() function

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 06:07:25PM -0400, stephane mottelet utc fr wrote:
> This is very confusing because some other xslt processors (ie Xalan)
> do not behave like this; they accept to load the document with
> a reference built as teh result of a call to concat().

  the spec, just the spec and only the spec. Are you suggesting
that libxslt is not compliant (in which case I would need a full
bug report with an explanation telling how the code behaviour violates
the spec) or that Xalan is not compliant (which is not my problem).

> I have looked at the w3c recommendation and still cannot figure out
> how I have to write the arguments to document() to achieve what I
> want.

  This might not be possible the way you're doing things, but this
is not a good reason to complain about a compliant implementation.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/