Re: [xml] Licence wording

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 02:47:07PM +0000, Philip Ludlam wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> This may have been mentioned before, but the first paragraph of in the
> file 'Copyright' doesn't make grammatical sense, to me at least.
>
> Quote:
> "Except where otherwise noted in the source code (trio files, hash.c
> and list.c) covered by a similar licence but with different Copyright
> notices:"
>
> IMHO I think something like this would be better/clearer:
> "Except where otherwise noted in the source code (i.e. the files hash.c,
> list.c and the trio files, which are covered by a similar licence but
> with different Copyright notices) all the files are:"
>
> Comments?

  Ohh, right :-), nobody spotted that yet !
I think the change makes sense. I also updated the date to 2003,

  thanks for the report !

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/