Re: [xml] [PATCH] Patch for https(ssl) support
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: Peter Jacobi <pj walter-graphtek com>
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] [PATCH] Patch for https(ssl) support
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:55:19 -0400
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 03:37:13PM +0200, Peter Jacobi wrote:
Speaking only from a semi-informed point of view, wouldn't the
option to delegate I/O to libcurl be the least intrusive patch?
Of course wrapped in #ifdef LIBCURL_REPLACE_NANOIO.
Point is taht I do not want to build a dependancy with another library
at the code level. I think you can do that glue easilly on top of the
existing interface (and override nano* implementation too).
So yes it may make sense for you, you should be able to do it, but I
don't want that at the code level.
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
] [Thread Prev