Re: [xml] GHashTable as replacement of built-in xmlHashTable
- From: Bjorn Reese <breese mail1 stofanet dk>
- To: Kang Jeong-Hee <Keizi mail co kr>
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] GHashTable as replacement of built-in xmlHashTable
- Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 11:52:49 +0000
Kang Jeong-Hee wrote:
GLib 2 provide a hash table; GHashTable.
Its APIs are nearly equivalent to ones of xmlHashTable.
I propose GHashTable as replacement of xmlHashTable
and removing hash.[ch] from libxml2.
Why?
Does xmlHashTable cause problems? Does GHashTable provide added
benefits (functionality, performance, maintainability?)
GHashTable is dependent on other parts of glib and is distributed
under a different license than libxml. How do you plan to address
these issues?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
